“Surprised By Joy”:
Joy in the Christian Life and in Christian Scholarship
ETS Presidential Address
© David M. Howard, Jr., Ph.D.
Professor of Old Testament
This address will appear in JETS 47.1 (March 2004)
All Rights Reserved.
Fellow members of the ETS and friends:
I stand before you tonight for the first time unfettered by
the constraints of speaking officially, whether as a study-group chair, the
Society’s program chair, as moderator of a business meeting, or as a spokesman
for the Executive Committee. I stand
before you tonight to speak on my own behalf and, I hope, also on the Lord’s
behalf.
I think back to my first ETS meeting in 1981 in
Despite the high honor, however, when I have thought about
this night over the past year, usually it has been with a sense of great
dread. This is because of the membership
challenge concerning open theism and inerrancy that lay before us, which we
finally brought to a conclusion last night.
[2]
I did not know how that evening would turn
out, but God did. My sense is that, for
most of us, a certain justice was achieved, and the Society has come through
this challenge the better for it.
So, by his grace, I stand before you this night, not with
the dread of this past year, but with great joy. I rejoice in the opportunity we enjoy
tonight: to fellowship together and to be reminded of the need for joy in our
lives. I rejoice in the 55-year history of the ETS and the 26 years I have been
a member. I rejoice in the growth of the Society, especially in recent years.
[3]
I rejoice in the spirit in which most things
have taken place over the years, including the difficult events of this past
year.
I want to speak to you tonight about the joy that is
incumbent upon all of us as Christians and as scholars. But, beyond the speaking, I want us to
participate in a sensory experience. I
mean that we should use every sense and every faculty possible as we consider
joy. I want us to “taste and see that
the LORD is
good” (Ps 34:8).
[4]
Our scholarship is not done—at least it should not be done—in a vacuum, in a
musty study with no connection to the world around us. Ultimately, our scholarship should be done in
a doxological context: it needs to be done to the praise and the glory of God.
So tonight we will do something that we have never done
before at an ETS banquet, namely, we will sing together. It is my deep conviction that theology is
ultimately doxological. So, in addition
to working with and on a text, we also must let the text speak to us, inform
us, transform us, wash over us, renew us. One way to express this is through song, and so, at two points in my
address, I will ask you to join me in singing reverent and joyful praises to
God.
Before I begin, I want to thank and acknowledge several
people. First and foremost is my wife
Jan, who is here tonight. She has been a
supportive observer of my participation in the ETS since 1981, and she is
delighted finally to be able to come and see at first hand what we do
here. My father, David Howard, Sr., also
is here. He was a student of two of our
illustrious predecessors, Merrill C. Tenney and Kenneth S. Kantzer, and he has
spent a lifetime of service in missions work. Finally, I want to acknowledge and thank my provost at Bethel Seminary,
Leland Eliason. Leland has been very encouraging and affirming to me this year
in a variety of ways. He also has
performed a great service to the Society, in releasing me from some course
duties, which has allowed me to give the time needed to the recent membership
challenge.
Finally, today is
C. S. Lewis and Surprised by Joy
In his book Surprised
by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life,
[6]
C.
S. Lewis tells the story of his conversion to faith in Jesus Christ. It is a very moving book, in which we see the
constant interplay between Lewis’ intuition and experience, on the one hand,
and his reason and intellect, on the other.
While there are many components in this work that I have found myself
marking, underlining, and coming back to again and again—countless nuggets of
wisdom, in and of themselves—my interest in the book here lies in its central
narrative describing Lewis’ experience of—and, at the same time, his constant
search for—what he calls “Joy” (the word is capitalized in his usage). And, the book has a surprise ending, where
Lewis discovers that what he was searching for was not “Joy” at all.
Lewis is not attempting a technical study of joy in the
biblical sense, either in the Old Testament or the New Testament. Nevertheless, at its core, his use of “Joy” is indeed deeply biblical. The Bible
uses a great constellation of words by which to express joy. In the Old Testament, the primary terms are lyg (gyl: “rejoice”), jmc (cmj “be glad, rejoice”), nnr (“shout for joy”).
[7]
In the New Testament, the most prominent
terms are ajgalliavomai (agalliaomai: “exult, shout for joy, rejoice greatly”), eujfraivnw (euphrainw: “gladden, cheer [up]),” and especially caivrw (chairw: “be
glad, rejoice”).
[8]
There is a great array of reasons for this
rejoicing, all of them oriented to God himself. He is the Object who draws out the joy from his followers.
For Lewis, the essential component of “Joy” is a deep-seated longing for something that is
supremely desirable. As a child, he
had early glimpses of this in fleeting experiences that overwhelmed him in a
rush, then just as quickly vanished.
[9]
His mind and eyes were opened, by different
stimuli, to things in another dimension, beyond this world. But, just as quickly, he was brought back to
the mundane “realities” around him. He
defines “Joy,” then, as “an unsatisfied desire which is itself more desirable
than any other satisfaction.”
[10]
He sharply distinguishes “Joy” from happiness
or pleasure, which are much more oriented to the immediate, to gratifications
of various types, most of them instant, ephemeral, and, in the end, not
satisfying over a long term. “Joy” only shares with them the fact that it is
something intensely to be desired. He
states that “I doubt whether anyone who has ever tasted [Joy] would ever, if
both were within his power, exchange it for all the pleasures in the world.”
[11]
Further, “Joy is distinct not only from
pleasure in general but even from aesthetic pleasure. It must have the stab, the pang, the inconsolable
longing.”
[12]
Lewis describes in this book, then, his search for “Joy.” The teasing glimpses of it that
he experienced in early childhood, and then as a schoolboy when he discovered
the Norse gods, were gradually revealed to him in larger portions when he was a
young adult as he was drawn closer and closer to the true God who was the
Source of this “Joy,” and, indeed, who was also its Object, as Lewis
discovered. God was the Object toward
which “Joy” was pointing.
Lewis endured a rather dreary childhood in many
respects. His mother died when he was
very young. He did not have a close
relationship with his father, and he was sent off to two different boarding schools,
where he was mostly miserable. He did,
as he put it, “become an effective
believer” in organized religion,
[13]
and he “began seriously to pray and to read my Bible and attempt to obey my
conscience,” but “For many years Joy (as I have defined it) was not only absent
but forgotten.”
[14]
And, his being “an effective believer” was short-lived. In his early teens and at a new school, he
writes, “I ceased to be a Christian.”
[15]
This happened gradually: “little by little,
with fluctuations which I cannot now trace, I became an apostate, dropping my
faith with no sense of loss but with the greatest relief.”
[16]
In what he describes as a “renaissance,” Lewis had a
memorable encounter that changed his life up to that point. He encountered Norse mythology and the great
pantheon of powerful Norse gods. The
mystery, grandeur, and allure of what he called “the Northernness” engulfed him
and set him on a new path, a new quest: to pursue the feelings that were
elicited in him, as he puts it, by the “vision of huge, clear spaces hanging
above the Atlantic in the endless twilight of Northern summer, remoteness,
severity.”
[17]
This awakened the old longings for “Joy” that
he’d had as a younger child. To “‘have
it again’ was the supreme and only important object of desire,”
[18]
remote as it might be. He read as much
as he could of the Northern gods, and listened to their story told musically in
Wagner’s majestic music of the Ring cycle. He related to these gods with
“something very like adoration, some kind of quite disinterested
self-abandonment to an object which securely claimed this by simply being the
object it was.”
[19]
But, he of course never actually believed in
the existence of these gods, except
as literary or mythological creations.
The “Northernness” was “essentially a desire and implied the absence of
its object.”
[20]
Essentially, it was simply a desire for its
own sake. But, he reflects years later,
looking back, that “Sometimes I can almost think that I was sent back to the
false gods there to acquire some capacity for worship against the day when the
true God should recall me to Himself.”
[21]
Lewis was sent off in his later teens to study with a tutor
who prepared him well for his university studies at Oxford, and he remembers
that “I was now happier than I had ever been,”
[22]
for various reasons that need not detain us here. However, he gradually experienced a “fading
of the Northernness,”
[23]
in which he experienced the old thrill less and less. Ironically, even though he had immersed
himself in the Northernness—by study, by music—trying to experience “Joy” again
and again, it rarely came to him. As he
focused more and more on this, “Finally I woke from building the temple to find
that the God had flown.”
[24]
He did not get the old thrill.
He did learn (by experience, apparently) that sexual desire
and satisfaction did not bring “Joy”; it was pleasure. He writes, “Joy is not a substitute for sex;
sex is very often a substitute for Joy. I sometimes wonder whether all pleasures are not substitutes for Joy.”
[25]
And, during these years, he became a
thoroughgoing rationalist whose world “was free from the Christian God.”
[26]
In his university years and afterwards, in his twenties,
Lewis gradually was exposed to writers who opened his mind to the Transcendent
again, and, in telling of this phase, Lewis titles one of his chapters “Check” (as in a chess game, signaling impending victory). He found that “Magic” in the works of Yeats
and others was a great attraction, a possible source of “Joy,” but, in the end,
he realized that it was just as irrelevant to “Joy” as Eros had been. He discovered the writings of George
MacDonald, wherein he saw “Holiness,” which embodied “Joy” in some way. He writes that “never had the wind of Joy
blowing through any story been less separable from the story itself.”
[27]
Lewis’ intellectual options gradually
narrowed as he read and discussed; he found himself forced by the sheer logic
in books he read and people with whom he associated to acknowledge the very
real possibility of a God. He did not
experience “Joy” very much in these years of searching; he labeled it
“aesthetic experience” and talked much about
it, but did not experience it much.
[28]
One aspect of Lewis’ journey that I find the most compelling
and moving is his encounter with the philosopher Samuel Alexander and his book Space, Time, and Deity.
[29]
Alexander speaks of “enjoyment” and
“contemplation.” For Alexander,
“enjoyment” is about a process and “contemplation” is about an object.
[30]
So, as Lewis puts it (explaining Alexander),
“When you see a table you ‘enjoy’ the act of seeing and ‘contemplate’ the
table. Later, if you took up Optics and
thought about Seeing itself, you would be contemplating the seeing and enjoying
the thought.”
[31]
This discovery had a great impact upon
Lewis. “It seemed to me self-evident
that one essential property of love, hate, fear, hope, or desire was attention
to their object. To cease thinking about
or attending to the woman is, so far, to cease loving; to cease thinking about
or attending to the dreaded thing is, so far, to cease being afraid. But to attend to your own love or fear is to
cease attending to the loved or dreaded object. In other words the enjoyment and the contemplation of our inner
activities are incompatible. You cannot
hope and also think about hoping at the same moment.”
[32]
As a result of this, Lewis learned that all of his longings
and striving after “Joy” had been “a futile attempt to contemplate the
enjoyed.”
[33]
He had been focusing on a feeling, an
experience, a process that had no Object.
What he had been focusing on was “not the wave but the wave’s imprint on
the sand.”
[34]
He realized that he had made “Joy” itself
into an idol. He’d known that “Joy” was
a desire, but he’d never realized that “a desire is turned not to itself but to
its object.”
[35]
He learned that “Joy itself, considered
simply as an event in my own mind, turned out to be of no value at all. All the value lay in that of which Joy was
the desiring.”
[36]
He learned of awe—the Old Testament would
call this “fear” (yiraeh)—and that the answers were not within
himself, but that “in deepest solitude there is a road right out of the self.”
[37]
Finally, in a chapter entitled “Checkmate,” Lewis writes:
“In the Trinity Term of 1929 I gave in, and admitted that God was God, and
knelt and prayed: perhaps, that night, the most dejected and reluctant convert
in all
This is a glorious and heartening testimony of one man’s
journey to faith in God.
[39]
However, Lewis was not yet “home.” “Checkmate” is not the final chapter. He had to walk the final steps toward
understanding who Jesus was—this Jesus of whom we have been speaking during
this entire Annual Meeting, in plenary sessions and in countless papers. And, the story of his discovery of Jesus is
the surprise ending of which I spoke earlier.
This is because, finally, Lewis discovered that his quest
for “Joy”—and even his fleeting experiences of it over the years—was not, in
the end, what he was really after. He
had been focusing on the experience,
on the search—his search. That is, his
focus had not been on any particular object. But, as he began to believe and to pray
(genuine prayer now, as opposed to the cold formality of religious exercise in
which he had previously engaged), he found that these activities “were the
beginning of extroversion.”
[40]
He was beginning, finally, to get beyond
himself. And, Lewis found ultimate
satisfaction, as he puts it, in knowing that “Jesus Christ is the Son of God.”
[41]
Lewis then moves on to his conclusion, which is rather
startling. He asks, “But what, in
conclusion, of Joy? for that, after all, is what the story has mainly been
about. To tell you the truth, the subject
has lost nearly all interest for me since I became a Christian.”
[42]
This statement is on the last page of the
book, and it stunned me the first time I read it. Why, after so many years—and so many pages—of
searching for “Joy,” would Lewis say that he now scarcely even thought about it?!
The answer, as you certainly have guessed, is because of the
presence in Lewis’ life now of the ultimate Object
of affection. “Joy” itself was not
to be worshiped, focused on, or “enjoyed” (in Alexander’s sense). Jesus Christ was. Lewis states, “I now know that the experience
[of Joy], considered as a state of my own mind, had never had the kind of
importance I once gave it. It was
valuable only as a pointer to something other and outer.”
[43]
He speaks of signposts pointing the way out
of the woods to someone lost there. The lost person is grateful to the
signposts. But, in the end, they are not
the object of the one who is lost; rather, that to which they point is the
object.
[44]
As I have reflected on what Lewis wrote, and the biblical
concept of joy, it is clear that joy is intended by God to be something that we
humans very much do experience, even “enjoy” (in the normal sense, not
Alexander’s). But, the key is that joy
is not the object of our search. It is
the result of that search, when we have found and experienced God in the
fullness of his glory, in who he is, in the mighty acts that he does on our
behalf.
Christians are as guilty as anyone else of confusing joy
with pleasure or happiness. These latter
things are fleeting; joy is something that does not fade with
overexposure. Eating an ice cream sundae
is a pleasure, but it soon turns to misery if one does not stop eating. Shopping is a pleasure (for some people), but
it ultimately is empty; it does not bring lasting satisfaction. The pursuit of money is a pleasure for some,
but it too does not satisfy. (Witness
the famous reply by an industrialist of the 19th century when he was
asked how much money was “enough” for true happiness [or joy]: “Just a little
bit more.”
[45]
) Sex is an intense physical pleasure, but it
turns to exhaustion if pursued non-stop, or, worse, to ennui, to boredom. It too
lacks the capacity to bring deep-seated, lasting satisfaction in and of itself.
True joy only comes as a result of our experience of God,
not through the pursuit of various pleasures.
On a mundane (meaning “earthly”) level, we can experience joy in things
as simple as a beautiful sunset, a loved one’s presence, or a baby’s
smile. These are things of which we
should never tire.
I was privileged during my doctoral work to write a
dissertation
[46]
wherein
I was immersed in some of the most gloriously joyful language in all the
Scriptures. I was studying Psalms
93-100, where wave after wave of joyful praise of YHWH the King comes cascading
forth. These are the so-called “Kingship
of YHWH” psalms, and the “book” of the Psalter in which they are found—Book IV:
Psalms 90-106—has been called the editorial “center” of the Psalter,
[47]
in no small measure because of the great climax of praise found in these psalms.
Listen to some of the language
here.
[48]
Psalm 95
1Oh come, let us sing to
the LORD;
let us make a joyful noise to the rock of our salvation!
2Let us come into his
presence with thanksgiving;
let us make a joyful noise to him with songs of praise!
3For the LORD is a great
God,
and a great King above all gods.
6Oh come, let us worship
and bow down;
let us kneel before the LORD, our Maker!
7For he is our God,
and we are the people of his pasture,
and the sheep of his hand.
Psalm 96
1Oh sing to the LORD a
new song;
sing to the LORD, all the earth!
2Sing to the LORD, bless his name;
tell of his salvation from day to day.
3Declare his glory among the nations,
his marvelous works among all the peoples!
4For great is the LORD, and greatly to be praised;
he is to be feared above all gods.
6Splendor and majesty are before him;
strength and beauty are in his sanctuary.
7Ascribe to the LORD, O families of the peoples,
ascribe to the LORD glory and strength!
8Ascribe to the LORD the glory due his name;
bring an offering, and come into his courts!
9Worship the LORD in the splendor of holiness;
tremble before him, all the earth!
10Say among the nations, "The LORD reigns!
Yes, the world is established; it shall never be moved;
he will judge the peoples with equity."
11Let the heavens be glad, and let the earth rejoice;
let the sea roar, and all that fills it;
12let the field exult, and everything in it!
Then shall all the trees of the forest sing for joy
13before the LORD, for he comes,
for he comes to judge the earth.
He will judge the world in righteousness,
and the peoples in his faithfulness.
1The LORD reigns, let
the earth rejoice;
let the many coastlands be glad!
6The heavens proclaim his righteousness,
and all the peoples see his glory.
8Zion hears and is glad,
and the daughters of
because of your judgments, O LORD.
9For you, O LORD, are most high over all the earth;
you are exalted far above all gods.
1Oh sing to the LORD a
new song,
for he has done marvelous things!
His right hand and his holy arm
have worked salvation for him.
2The LORD has made known his salvation;
he has revealed his righteousness in the sight of the nations.
3He has remembered his steadfast love and faithfulness
to the house of
All the ends of the earth have seen
the salvation of our God.
4Make a joyful noise to the LORD, all the earth;
break forth into joyous song and sing praises!
5Sing praises to the LORD with the lyre,
with the lyre and the sound of melody!
6With trumpets and the sound of the horn
make a joyful noise before the King, the LORD!
7Let the sea roar, and all that fills it;
the world and those who dwell in it!
8Let the rivers clap their hands;
let the hills sing for joy together
9before the LORD, for he comes
to judge the earth.
He will judge the world with righteousness,
and the peoples with equity.
1Make a joyful noise to
the LORD, all the earth!
2Serve the LORD with gladness!
Come into his presence with singing!
4Enter his gates with thanksgiving,
and his courts with praise!
Give thanks to him; bless his name!
5For the LORD is good;
his steadfast love endures forever,
and his faithfulness to all generations.
How can we hear this and not
have a great sense of joy? How can we
hear this and not want to fall prostrate before the King, or to dance before
him, joyfully offering whatever praises we are capable of, however miserable
they might be compared to the praises offered by all of creation itself?
In another one of his books, Reflections on the Psalms, C. S. Lewis ponders the question of why
people should praise God.
[49]
Before his conversion, he “found a stumbling
block in the demand so clamorously made by all religious people that we should
‘praise’ God; still more in the suggestion that God Himself demanded it.”
[50]
But, as he pondered it, he came to realize
that all enjoyment eventually overflows into praise: “The world rings with
praise—lovers praising their mistresses, readers their favorite poet, walkers
praising the countryside, players praising their favorite game—praise of
weather, wines, dishes, actors, motors, horses, colleges, countries, historical
personages, children, flowers, mountains, rare stamps, beetles, even sometimes
politicians or scholars. I had not
noticed how the humblest, and at the same time most balanced and capacious,
minds, praised most, while the cranks, misfits and malcontents praised least.”
[51]
And, concerning that awkward trait of the Psalms—wherein
there are incessant urgings to praise, causing a cynic possibly to ask, “Why
don’t they stop talking about it and
just get around to doing the
praising?!”—Lewis realized something else, very profound. He writes, “I had not noticed either that
just as men spontaneously praise whatever they value, so they spontaneously
urge us to join them in praising it: ‘Isn’t she lovely? Wasn’t it glorious?
Don’t you think that magnificent?’ The
Psalmists in telling everyone to praise God are doing what all men do when they
speak of what they care about.”
[52]
The connection between praise—which is not in the title of
my address—and joy—which is in my
title—comes in that praising the Object of our affections brings us joy. Praise is something that is almost pulled out
of us, in spite of ourselves, by the inherent qualities of its Object. We see something of the inherent quality of a
thing in Psalm 1, where the object of affection is the law:
1Blessed is the man
who walks not in the counsel of the wicked,
nor stands in the way of sinners,
nor sits in the seat of scoffers;
2but his delight is in the law of the LORD,
and on his law he meditates day and night.
The term for delight in v. 2 is j}Pex,
and it carries the idea that the object of affection—or of contemplation, using
Alexander’s term—is something so inherently desirable that it draws out of us a
sense of desire and excitement to come to it.
[53]
G. J. Botterweck speaks of “the joyous
existential commitment of one’s entire life” in this connection.
[54]
Lewis says that “I
think we delight to praise what we enjoy because the praise not merely
expresses but completes the enjoyment; it is its appointed consummation. It is not out of compliment that lovers
keep on telling one another how beautiful they are; the delight is incomplete
till it is expressed. It is frustrating
to have discovered a new author and not be able to tell anyone how good he is;
to come suddenly, at the turn of the road, upon some mountain valley of
unexpected grandeur and then to have to keep silent because the people with you
care for it no more than for a tin can in the ditch; to hear a good joke and
find no one to share it with.”
[55]
So it is with God. He
is the worthiest Object of all to praise. In our experience of him, we have great joy. The Psalmist (David) says in Psalm 16:11:
“You make known to me the path of life; // in your presence there is fullness
of joy; // at your right hand are pleasures forevermore.”
We are focused in this year’s Annual Meeting on the topic of
“Jesus.”
[56]
It is a most worthy and exciting topic. We have enjoyed the plenary sessions and the
papers. But, we have been distracted,
too. We have dealt with a membership
challenge that has consumed the Society for most of 2003, climaxing in our
special business meeting last night.
But, “Jesus” is a worthy focus to which to return tonight. In the words of the author of Hebrews, we
should “look to Jesus” (Heb 12:1-2):
1Therefore, since we are
surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every
weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race
that is set before us, 2looking to Jesus, the founder and
perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the
cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of
God.
Do you remember the hymn inspired by those words (“Turn Your
Eyes Upon Jesus”)? Let us sing the
chorus together:
Turn your eyes
upon Jesus,
Look full in His wonderful face,
And the things of earth will grow strangely dim,
In the light of His glory and grace.
[57]
There are so many things that compete for our attention,
that distract us from truly worshiping, praising, enjoying God. Many of these things are good things, and
many are not.
One thing that gets in the way of our joy is our desperate
desire to do things right, or to “get it right.” It is something I call “terminal
earnestness.” It is a condition wherein
we are so desperate—so earnest—to “get things right” in the matter of spiritual
affairs that we squeeze any joy completely out of our lives. We become as dead automatons, doing all the
“right” things in all the “right” ways, but without any true life of the
Spirit, without any joy in our lives.
Our terminal earnestness can include many things, such as “doing church” right, having the latest programs from the most successful
churches, including their orders of service and just the right worship
band. It can include keeping up with all
the unwritten rules and regulations of whatever evangelical subculture to which
we belong.
[58]
We can become almost like the Pharisees in
Jesus’ day, who worried so much about keeping the law that they ended up
practicing absurdities and losing sight of their God. For example, their concerns led to an entire
tractate of the Talmud (Shabbath)
devoted just to regulations about keeping the Sabbath!
[59]
Such worrying can come from well-motivated impulses. The almost absurd regulations that eventuated
in the tractate Shabbath came from
the Pharisees’ sincere desires to know what it meant to keep the Sabbath
commandment. In the process of trying to
work this out, many Jews lost sight of the focus of the commandment—which was
rest and remembrance, rooted in Creation (Exodus 20) and in the Exodus
(Deuteronomy 5)—and they only saw the “doing”: the rules, the regulations, the
constraints. They lost any sense of joy
in the keeping and remembering.
So too in many of our evangelical subcultures. We become so obsessed with “doing church” right that we squeeze any life of the Spirit out of our churches. We become so worried that we won’t have read
the latest Barna poll, the most recent Willow Creek leadership materials, or
the latest Sunday-School materials from our denominational presses that we
spend all our time reading secondary literature and surfing the Internet for the
latest in church-related materials. We
end up reading the Bible in a very cursory fashion, or not at all. We end up not spending quality time in
prayer, and not listening to God in quiet meditation. We end up missing the presence of the Spirit
in our lives—indeed, sometimes even quenching him.
We as laypeople are so worried about getting the “right”
books on Christian marriage, parenting, dieting, exercise, ecology,
relationships, Bible study, financial management, business practices—“Christian
yoga,” even!—that we miss tasting and seeing that the Lord is good. In some circles, we worry so much about
proper dress or clothing; going to movies, plays, dances; smoking, drinking,
doing drugs; or any of a thousand other “vices,” that we miss any sense of joy
in our lives.
But, the problems are not just with us as “misguided” laypeople. The problem also lies with us
as Christian scholars. We scholars deal every day with eternal
verities—truths with eternal consequences and of the utmost import. Because of this we naturally—and rightly
so!—do our utmost to “get it right.” We do this in our classes, and in our
articles and our books. We do it in our
papers and our discussions here in the Society. We spend our days, our months, our years studying the Scriptures,
plumbing them for all the treasures therein. Sometimes the process itself can
be a great joy. We have the joy of discovery. We have joy of seeing and
learning. We have the joy of teaching
others, watching them learn, develop, and grow in their knowledge of the
Scriptures and of the Lord.
But a sense of terminal earnestness also can creep in, that
sense whispering to us that if we do not get it right—if we cannot get it
exactly the way it is “supposed” to be—then we are failures, at best, or heretics,
at worst. This often leads to a sense of
paralysis and of joylessness.
I regularly see this sense of paralysis in seminary
students. They are processing huge
amounts of new information in their various classes. They are learning many different methods for
studying the Bible, for dealing with people, for solving problems. In the process, many of them lose almost any
sense of the God behind the assignments, of the God toward whom the Scriptures
point, of the God who should be the reason for the intense efforts that they are putting in. The Bible becomes for them little more than a
textbook, just like any other book that they read in high school or college.
In the spring of 2000, I took our oldest daughter, Christina,
who was in her early teens at the time, to a dramatic production in New Orleans
entitled “Beyond the Grave: Class of 2000.”
It was the type of play often performed in churches that focuses on
people’s encounter with God after death. This one was very moving, based loosely as it was upon the Columbine
tragedy that had taken place a few months earlier. In the first hour, the lives of five students
and one teacher were portrayed, some of whom were Christians and some of whom
were not. After three young men came
into their classroom and shot them all dead, the second hour focused on each
individual’s first encounter with God beyond the grave. Each was very dramatic, with powerful
teachings about the Gospel.
One brief moment from this production especially caught my
attention, and it has to do with our topic of joy. One of the students who died had been a
sweet, conscientious Christian in life. She was popular in school, winsome, and unashamed of her faith.
[60]
When she arrived at the great hall after death,
she was at first bewildered, not knowing where she was. Tentatively, she called out, “Hello! … Hello!” Then, she recognized that she
had arrived in heaven, and she began trembling with excitement and
anticipation. She began laughing and
jumping for joy, and exclaimed, “I know where I am. I know where I am! Ohhhhhh,
God! I’ve been looking forward to this
day ever since I was ten years old.”
[61]
As I reflected on this moment, I was very moved to see an
18-year-old girl (the character in the play) who had had a consciousness
throughout her short life of looking forward to the day when she would meet her
Savior. And, when she arrived, it was a
moment of pure, unalloyed joy. To see
Jesus: that had been her great desire, and it was now her great joy.
One of the criticisms leveled at certain pietistic
traditions is that they are “so heavenly minded as to be of no earthly good,” and there is some truth in this criticism. But, in some other circles, the
pendulum has swung too far in the other direction, such that there is scarcely
even any thought of an eternity with
God, of the great joy of an afterlife in his presence. Surely there is a proper balance, one that
will allow us indeed to look forward with joyful anticipation to the day of
seeing Jesus face to face.
This summer, I heard a song for the first time that I am
going to have played for you shortly. It is called “Favorite Song of All.” It has been recorded a number of times; the
recording I have is by the Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir.
[62]
The title speaks of God’s “favorite” Song. The composition
imagines God listening to the Song of creation and the Song of all his
saints. He listens to the Song that is
sustained throughout the ages in praise of him.
But, as the lyrics indicate, his “favorite” Song of all is the Song of
the newly redeemed soul, raising its voice for the first time in praise of God,
joining the Song of the ages. It is this
Song that God wants to hear above all others.
Whenever I listen to these words, the image in my mind is of
a vast, drab, gray plain strewn with dead bodies—all of them dead in their
sins, in the imagery of Eph 2:1, 5. One
by one, they rise up and begin to sing their first notes of praise as the Holy
Spirit passes along and gives them life. These souls who were dead in their sins now join the rest of creation in
the Song of the ages. This, then, indeed
is God’s “favorite” Song of all.
[63]
Consider this imagery as you listen to the
recording.
“Favorite
Song of All”
[64]
He
loves to hear the wind sing
as it whistles through the pines
on mountain peaks,
And He
loves to hear the raindrops
as they splash to the ground in a
magic melody.
And He
smiles in sweet approval
as the waves crash to the rocks
in their harmony;
All creation joins in unity
to sing to Him majestic
symphonies.
But
His favorite song of all
Is the song of the redeemed,
When lost sinners now made clean
lift their voices loud and
strong;
When those purchased by His blood
lift to Him a song of love.
There's nothing more He'd rather
hear—
None so pleasing to His ear—
as His favorite song of all.
He
loves to hear the angels
as they sing, "Holy, holy is
the Lamb!" —
(“Holy, holy, holy is the
Lamb!”)—
Heaven's choirs in harmony
lift up praises to the Great I
AM—
(“Hallelujah! Hallelujah!” )—
But He
lifts His hands for silence
when the weakest saved by grace
begins to sing,
And a
million angels listen
as a newborn soul sings, "I
have been redeemed!"
That’s His favorite song of all:
It’s the song of the redeemed,
When lost sinners now made clean
lift their voices loud and
strong;
When those purchased by His blood
lift to Him a song of love.
There's nothing more He'd rather
hear—
As His
favorite song of all.
It's
not just melodies and harmonies
that capture His attention,
It's not just clever lines and
phrases
that causes Him to stop and
listen,
But when any heart set free,
Washed and bought by Calvary, begins to sing.
That's His favorite song of all:
It’s the song of the redeemed,
When lost sinners now made clean
lift their voices loud and
strong;
When those purchased by His blood
lift to Him a song of love.
There's nothing more He'd rather
hear—
None so pleasing to His ear—
As His favorite song of all.
Holy,
holy, holy is the Lamb! Hallelujah, Hallelujah!
Holy, holy, holy is the Lamb! Hallelujah, Hallelujah!
We do much good as scholars, in presenting our papers,
publishing our books, preparing our lectures, teaching our classes, and so much
more. But, we must never forget that
these ultimately must serve the purpose of glorifying God and pointing people
to him. Our work must lead—sometimes
directly, sometimes indirectly—to new people joining in and singing God’s
“favorite” Song of all. All of these
things that we do are good, if they are done to his glory. All of these are good, if they are done with
great joy. All of these are good, if
they help to point people to Christ.
Ultimately, everything we do is to bring glory to God. We
are Christians, first and foremost, and scholars after that. So, we too should rejoice with the God of all
creation when even one newborn soul begins to sing the praises of God. We must be earnest about our task, but not
terminally so. We must also be joyful.
We are fast approaching Advent, when we rejoice in the birth
of the Savior. To conclude tonight, I
will ask you to sing “Joy to the World” with me. The primary Scripture text behind this great
hymn is Psalm 98, which we read earlier. In a sense, this hymn is simply Psalm 98 put to music. Let us sing it together, with a great sense
of joy.
“Joy
to the World”
[65]
Joy to the world, the Lord is come!
Let earth receive her King;
Let every heart prepare Him room,
And heaven and nature sing,
And heaven and nature sing,
And heaven, and heaven, and nature sing.
Joy to the world, the
Savior reigns!
Let men their songs employ;
While fields and floods, rocks, hills and plains
Repeat the sounding joy,
Repeat the sounding joy,
Repeat, repeat, the sounding joy.
No more let sins and sorrows grow,
Nor thorns infest the ground;
He comes to make His blessings flow
Far as the curse is found,
Far as the curse is found,
Far as, far as, the curse is found.
He
rules the world with truth and grace,
And makes the nations prove
The glories of His righteousness,
And wonders of His love,
And wonders of His love,
And wonders, wonders, of His love.
Now, as we dismiss, please listen to one of the great
doxologies of Scripture (from Jude 24-25), one that speaks of the joy of
redemption:
24Now to him who is able to keep you from stumbling and to present you blameless before the presence of his glory with great joy, 25to the only God, our Savior, through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory, majesty, dominion, and authority, before all time and now and forever. Amen.
[1]
JETS 25 (1982) 3-16. This
was a remarkable topic, coming from a dispensationalist. In my (obviously flawed) memory over the
years, I’d remembered the title as “Legitimate Continuities Between the
Testaments,” which is actually not that far from the main thrust of Ken’s
address.
[2]
The results of this special
business meeting of the Society may be found in this issue of the Journal, on pp. **.
[3]
There were 300 in
attendance at my first ETS meeting in Toronto, and, this year, there are 2400.
[4]
All Scripture quotations
are taken from The Holy Bible: English
Standard Version.
[5]
Some brief materials on
Phyllis Howard’s life and impact may be read at my Web site: www.bethel.edu/~dhoward.
[6]
C. S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life
(New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1955).
[7]
The best tools for
launching a study of semantic fields in Hebrew are (1) Abraham Even-Shoshan, A New Concordance of the Bible
(Jerusalem: Kiryat Sepher, 1981; 2nd ed. 1990); and (2) Willem
VanGemeren, ed., New International
Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis (NIDOTTE), 5 vols. (Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 1997). Both
Even-Shoshan and NIDOTTE list
synonyms in the semantic field for every lexeme, and NIDOTTE also includes a comprehensive list in its index volume
(vol. 5).
[8]
The best tool for launching
semantic-field work in Greek is Johannes P. Louw and Eugene A. Nida, eds., Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
Based on Semantic Domains, 2 vols.
(2nd ed.; New York: United Bible Societies, 1988, 1989). In addition, one also can access much of this
information in Colin Brown, ed., New
International Dictionary of New Testament Theology (NIDNTT), 3 vols. (Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 1975-1978).
[9]
Ibid. 15-17.
[10]
Ibid. 17-18.
[11]
Ibid. 18.
[12]
Ibid. 72. For Lewis, “Joy” was essentially what in
German is called Sehnsucht, an ardent
desire or wistful longing, sometimes with a hint of nostalgia.
[13]
Ibid. 33.
[14]
Ibid. 34.
[15]
Ibid. 58.
[16]
Ibid. 66.
[17]
Ibid. 73.
[18]
Ibid.
[19]
Ibid. 76-77.
[20]
Ibid. 82.
[21]
Ibid. 77.
[22]
Ibid. 159.
[23]
Ibid. 168.
[24]
Ibid. 165.
[25]
Ibid. 170. Lewis published these words in 1955, and he
came to this conclusion forty years earlier.
Imagine his thoughts if he were alive today, in our sex-drenched world,
with illegitimate sex oozing from almost every cultural pore!
[26]
Ibid. 171.
[27]
Ibid. 180. Those who have read the fiction of both
George MacDonald and Lewis realize the great influence of the former on the
latter. The world MacDonald creates in Phantastes, for example, is very
evocative of Lewis’ worlds of Narnia, Malacandra, Perelandra (somewhat), or
even heaven (the latter in The Great
Divorce).
[28]
Ibid. 205.
[29]
S. Alexander, Space, Time, and Deity. The Gifford Lectures at Glasgow 1916-18. 2 vols.
(New York: The Humanities Press, 1920).
[30]
This distinction is
fundamental to Alexander’s entire work (ibid.).
He introduces and makes explicit the distinction in vol. 1, pp. 10-18,
especially pp. 10-13.
[31]
Lewis, Surprised by Joy 217.
[32]
Ibid. 218.
[33]
Ibid. 219.
[34]
Ibid.
[35]
Ibid. 220.
[36]
Ibid.
[37] Ibid. 221. All through his narrative of his spiritual journey and awakening, Lewis uses delightful imageries to show that he is conscious of God’s pursuit of him. For example, he writes at one late stage, “And so the great Angler played His fish and I never dreamed that the hook was in my tongue” (p. 211). He repeatedly speaks of his “alarm” at the “danger” he was in (namely, that his own, carefully built systems were in “danger” of being torn apart by the ultimate Reality, God himself). He found that all of the greatest books that he had read “were beginning to turn against me” (p. 213), i.e. that all of them showed him something of true religion. He was compelled to abandon, one after another, all of his old prejudices and snobberies, and to consider the existence of a true—and real—Deity. In his chapter titled “Checkmate,” he writes that “All over the board my pieces were in the most disadvantageous positions. Soon I could no longer cherish even the illusion that the initiative lay with me. My Adversary began to make His final moves” (p. 216). Then, as God was closing in, Lewis characterizes this as follows: “The fox had been dislodged from Hegelian Wood and was now running in the open, ‘with all the wo in the world,’ bedraggled and weary, hounds barely one field behind. And nearly everyone [he’d ever read] was now (one way or another) in the pack…. Everyone and everything had joined the other side” (p. 225).
[38]
Ibid. 228-29.
[39]
A recent book highlights
Lewis’ process of conversion by examining much of the same ground as Lewis does
in Surprised by Joy. It goes beyond Lewis, however, and provides a
broader perspective, by supplementing this one book with materials from Lewis’ other writings, his letters, and the testimony of other people: David C.
Downing, The Most Reluctant Convert: C.
S. Lewis’ Journey to Faith (Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2002).
[40]
Lewis, Surprised by Joy 233.
[41]
Ibid. 237.
[42]
Ibid. 238.
[43]
Ibid. 238.
[44]
Lewis’ remarkable
transparency and self-disclosure is apparent even in the last sentence of the
book, where he states dryly, “Not, of course, that I don’t often catch myself
stopping to stare at roadside objects of even less importance” (p. 238).
[45]
I have thought that this
quote came from Andrew Carnegie or John D. Rockefeller, but I cannot now locate
its source.
[46]
Now published as The Structure of Psalms 93-100
(University of California, San Diego Biblical and Judaic Studies 5; Winona
Lake: Eisenbrauns, 1997).
[47]
Gerald Henry Wilson, The Editing of the Hebrew Psalter (SBLDS
76; Chico: Scholars Press, 1985) 215.
[48]
One of the rapidly
disappearing practices in our churches today is the public reading of
Scripture, and the Church is much the poorer for it. My former colleague, Tom McComiskey, had the
right idea when he wrote an entire book on the subject: Thomas E. McComiskey, Reading
Scripture in Public (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1991). So, I urge you to listen carefully and
reverentially—close your eyes, even—and let these magnificent texts wash over
you with their power and their very evident sense of joy.
[49]
C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms (New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1958), in a section entitled “A Word About Praising” (pp. 90-98). In a serendipitous (or
providential) appointment, I was recently reminded of this passage in a sermon
on Psalm 117, delivered last month by our ETS colleague, John Piper, at
Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis.
[50]
Ibid. 90.
[51]
Ibid. 94.
[52]
Ibid. 94-95.
[53] We who deal with Scripture sometimes are so close to it that it can become a burden to us, a mere object of study, another text to read, analyze, and to which we apply endless methodologies. We need to regain a sense of the Scriptures calling to us, “seducing” us, where we see in it an allure that makes us want to come to it joyfully, embrace it, listen to it, submit to it. This is the picture of the torah in Ps 1:2.
[54]
G. Johannes Botterweck, “xpej; j`p}x,” TDOT 5, 97.
[55]
C. S. Lewis, Reflections on the Psalms 95 (emphasis
mine). This is undoubtedly why we find so much junk mail in our e-mailboxes
these days: people want to “share their joy (or brilliance/humor/outrage)” with
us!
[56]
In an expanded version of
the official theme, this year’s program book is entitled: “Jesus Christ is the
Same Yesterday, Today, and Forever.”
[57] “Turn Your Eyes Upon Jesus”: Lyrics and music by Helen H. Lemmel (1922). Public Domain.
[58]
I note with interest that
my alma mater, Wheaton College, was
in the news last week for allowing an on-campus dance for the first time ever—a
radical break with certain “rules” in its subculture!
[59]
It is the second-longest tractate in the
Talmud (after Baba Bathra). The 157 folios (in 24 chapters) of b. Shabbath in the Soncino edition run
to more than 800 pages (The Babylonian
Talmud: Seder Mo`ed: Vol. 1: Shabbath
[I. Epstein, trans.; London: Soncino, 1938]). Jacob Neusner’s y. Shabbat runs to almost 500 pages, but his is only a “preliminary” work, and it does not include the Gemara for chaps. 21-24 (The
Talmud of the Land of Israel: A Preliminary Translation and Explanation:
Vol. 11: Shabbat [J. Neusner, trans.;
Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991]).
[60]
She was a composite of
Cassie Bernall and Rachel Scott of the Columbine tragedy.
[61]
“Beyond the Grave: Class of
2000” was presented by Victory Fellowship of Metairie, Louisiana, in the fall
of 1999, originally slated for a two-week run.
It had such an impact that it continued far beyond its original
projections and is now entering its fifth year of production. A videotape of the production is available
from Victory Fellowship at www.btg2000.com.
[62]
“Favorite Song of All,” on
the album of the same name by the Brooklyn Tabernacle Choir (New York and
Nashville: Warner Bros. Records, 1996).
This particular recording is very dramatic and stirring.
[63]
I do not want the impact of
these words to be blunted by any quibbling we might have with the song’s
theology. We might ask, “Why would God
favor a Song from a newly born believer over that of a believer who had sung
the Song faithfully over the course of a long life, or, for that matter, over
that of a host of angels who had sung their Song faithfully throughout the
ages?” My main point here in introducing “Favorite Song of All” is to return us
to a proper focus on the great task that lies before us: of glorifying God in
all we say and do, and of bringing people to a knowledge of him, through
Christ, so that they, too, can begin to sing God’s “favorite” Song of all.
[64]
“Favorite Song of All.” Lyrics and music by Dan Dean. © 1992 Dawn Treader Music (administered by
EMI Christian Music Publishing). All
Rights Reserved. Used by Permission.
[65]
“Joy to the World”: Lyrics
by Isaac Watts (1719); music by Lowell Mason (1848). Public Domain.